Why Nokia's Internet Tablet Failed to Impress Compared to Treo
Nokia's Internet Tablet was a range of mobile devices that aimed to provide a web browsing experience between a personal digital assistant (PDA) and an ultra-mobile PC (UMPC). However, despite its innovative features and design, it failed to impress many users and critics compared to other devices such as the Treo, a smartphone that also offered web access and email functionality.
In this article, we will explore some of the reasons why Nokia's Internet Tablet was not as successful as it hoped to be, and why some users might have laughed their ass off if it worked better on a Treo than on Nokia's own product.
Lack of Phone Capability
One of the major drawbacks of Nokia's Internet Tablet was that it did not have phone capability. This meant that users had to carry another device for making and receiving calls, which reduced the convenience and portability of the tablet. Moreover, some users complained that the tablet did not support voice over IP (VoIP) services such as Skype, which limited their communication options.
On the other hand, the Treo was a fully functional phone that also offered web browsing, email, messaging, and other applications. Users could easily switch between different modes and tasks without needing another device. The Treo also supported VoIP services such as Skype, which gave users more flexibility and choice in their communication.
Poor Battery Life
Another issue that plagued Nokia's Internet Tablet was its poor battery life. The tablet had a 1500 mAh battery that could only last for a few hours of web browsing or video playback. Users had to constantly charge their device or carry a spare battery with them. This reduced the usability and reliability of the tablet, especially for users who wanted to use it for longer periods of time or on the go.
The Treo, on the other hand, had a 1800 mAh battery that could last for up to 6 hours of talk time or 300 hours of standby time. Users could use their device for longer without worrying about running out of power. The Treo also had a power-saving mode that could extend the battery life by reducing the screen brightness and turning off wireless connections when not in use.
Limited App Selection
Nokia's Internet Tablet ran on Maemo, a Linux-based operating system that was designed for handheld devices. However, Maemo had a limited app selection compared to other platforms such as Android or iOS. Users had to rely on third-party developers or alternative distributions to get more apps and features for their device. Some of the apps that were available were also buggy or incompatible with the tablet's hardware or software.
The Treo ran on Palm OS, a popular operating system for PDAs and smartphones. Palm OS had a large and diverse app selection that catered to different needs and preferences of users. Users could easily find and download apps from various sources such as Palm's own app store or third-party websites. The apps were also optimized and tested for the Treo's hardware and software, ensuring a smooth and stable performance.
Nokia's Internet Tablet was an ambitious and innovative product that tried to offer a web browsing experience between a PDA and an UMPC. However, it failed to impress many users and critics due to its lack of phone capability, poor battery life, and limited app selection. Some users might have laughed their ass off if it worked better on a Treo than on Nokia's own product, as the Treo was a smartphone that also offered web access and email functionality, along with better battery life, app selection, and phone capability.
If you are looking for a device that can provide you with a web browsing experience between a PDA and an UMPC, you might want to consider other options such as Android tablets or Windows tablets. These devices have more features and capabilities than Nokia's Internet Tablet, and can also compete with other devices such as the Treo. aa16f39245